EA trying to get people to forget they renewed basically a complete monopoly on NFL games that majorly pissed off sports sport fans. EA and NFL did not induce eachother to Mut 21 coins a determination. I'm sure they are equally happy to make bucketloads of money. People just need to blame the party they hate the most. The NFL honestly doesnt care at all, they only care about their image and gains, they know the image that the nfl's had beneath EA and are satisfied with this ongoing without taking"danger" in seeing other publishers would introduce their brand. As for money they likely decided that however much ea is paying for exclusivity is close enough to offeset the additional profits gained from moving multi-published, im not happy about, but thats the reality. Many people outside echochambers similar to this one do not care.
Yeah we keep saying that. Majority of Reddit will not purchase it. Why the fuck would EA care if they still make absolute bank on the match. EA does something many people would regard as great and people find ways to make it bad. It's not entirely indifferent, but for example, we've seen that with pride month. Most companies only started doing it once they knew it had been fiscally secure to come out in service. Doesn't make it a terrible thing. Look at Netflix authors. A good deal of them have publicly said that they have desired x race or x-ray character in shows they've wanted to make, just for different studios to tell them to tone it down or remove it entirely. Netflix doesn't inform these folks to write stories like that, they have only given them the liberty to. Same with HBO.
Idk, how I see it, companies are always trying to pander. Examine the"we're all going through rough times" shit we got for covid19. I really don't understand why folks single out Pride month pandering year in, year out. I really don't know why folks single out Pride month pandering year after year. Because often, a lot of companies that have supported anti-LGBT policies, politicians, or even perhaps have only been not incredibly progressive previously, all slap on rainbow avatars on Twitter and say some words that are hollow, or worse, trying to monetize pride-themed merchandise. Because often, a lot of companies who have supported anti-LGBT policies, politicians, or even perhaps have just been not terribly progressive previously, all slap rainbow avatars on Twitter and say some hollow words, or worse, attempting to market pride-themed product. It is singled out since it is particularly clear. I think fauxgressive is better. Passive progressive sounds just like an actual progressive entity who makes no innovative actions. Fauxgressive seems like someone pretending to buy mut coins madden 21 be progressive. I recall reading that a large segment of the LGBTQ community hates how corporate Pride Parades have gotten since those businesses were nowhere to be observed when their service could have made a difference, particularly at the height of the AIDS crisis.