There's nothing wrong wanting a game to Animal Crossing Items be better, irrespective of precedence.

There are two people here literally saying they hate decorating and talking. And certain it's no problem if people want to spin up themselves over something absurd, but it is perplexing none the less.

AgeEighty said folks want features which were in past matches, and you misinterpreted that as"not needing items in Animal Crossing." I wouldn't be shocked if you neglected to understand different remarks here as well.

They can begin by sending a completed product on release.

I averted New Horizons because of the upgrade scheme, and also the issues people are having with it since are nearly vindicating. Nobody should dislike playing Animal Crossing if they're going into it with a relaxed mind, so it still sucks to see folks frustrated with this, but I urge New Leaf instead. Even with its Welcome Amiibo expansion (which is currently on the cartridge for new carts), the match wasn't in update hell and has been more or less finish daily one.

Bonus, there is no durability or other Minecraft-like mechanics. However, you lose the candy map-making abilities...

The item is already complete on release. This match was not in development for decades for nothing. And I'm not someone who is likely to go against Aya Kyogoku considering how much she adored AC on New Leaf and on New Horizons as manager, to the point where she had been buy Animal Crossing New Horizons Items encouraged last year in Nintendo as supervisor in place of Nogami (manufacturer of Splatoon/AC) who was also encouraged.

Category

Date & Time

Location & full address

Event Admins